The marble lobby is visible. The financial machinery behind it is not. Yet that machinery pays the staff, insures the structure, replaces the elevators, repairs the façade, and determines whether tomorrow’s buyer can obtain a mortgage.
A condo purchase is two purchases at once: an apartment and a share of responsibility for the building around it. Financial review is not a hunt for a perfect ratio or a single reassuring balance. It is an attempt to understand whether the property’s income, cash, planning, and governance fit the obligations ahead.
Start with a document set, not a single statement
One audited statement is a snapshot. A meaningful review needs enough history to show direction, enough current information to catch what happened after the audit, and enough context to connect money with the physical property.
Two or three years of audited financial statements, if available, plus the notes and accountant’s opinion—not just the first pages.
The current budget, recent year-to-date results, common-charge schedule, receivables or arrears information, and details of any assessment.
Capital plan or reserve study if one exists, major contracts, open or planned projects, insurance summary, claim history, and financing or credit facilities.
Board minutes, managing-agent questionnaire, litigation disclosures, recent increases, owner-occupancy information, and sponsor or investor concentration.
The buyer’s attorney ordinarily handles formal legal due diligence and document requests. A lender has its own project review. The buyer’s agent should make the commercial questions visible early: what changed, what may cost owners money, what could narrow financing, and how the findings compare with similar buildings.
Read the income statement as a story about operations
Begin with recurring revenue: common charges, commercial income, storage or parking income, move fees, and other dependable sources. Then follow recurring expenses—staff, utilities, repairs, management, insurance, professional fees, contracts, and taxes paid by the condominium. Compare actual results with the prior year and, when available, with the budget.
A deficit is not automatically disqualifying. A building may deliberately spend operating cash on a planned project, or an unusual repair may distort one year. A surplus is not automatically reassuring either; it may be created by postponing work, reducing a reserve contribution, or benefiting from an expense that has not yet normalized.
Questions behind a budget variance
- Is the change temporary, or has it appeared for several years?
- Did insurance, payroll, utilities, repairs, or professional fees rise materially?
- Was a reserve contribution budgeted but not made?
- Does commercial income depend heavily on one tenant or lease?
- Are legal costs connected to a resolved matter or an ongoing dispute?
- Has the current budget caught up with the latest actual expenses?
Low common charges are valuable only when the budget can carry the building without repeatedly asking owners for rescue capital.
The balance sheet: what the building has and owes
The balance sheet brings together cash, investments, receivables, prepaid expenses, liabilities, loans, and fund balances at a moment in time. The most tempting number is cash. Resist reading it alone.
Ask how much cash is unrestricted, how much is committed, whether assessment proceeds are sitting temporarily before a project payment, and whether current liabilities are about to consume the balance. Review receivables to understand unpaid common charges and whether arrears are concentrated or growing. Look for loans, lines of credit, insurance obligations, contract payables, and other liabilities that may compete with planned work.
A year-end balance may include assessment collections earmarked for façade work, elevator modernization, or another signed contract. The notes and current project status matter as much as the headline number.
Reserves mean little without the capital plan
There is no responsible citywide rule that says a condo of a certain size must hold a particular reserve balance. Two buildings with the same cash may have completely different risk. One may have new mechanical systems and a modest envelope; the other may have multiple elevators, a pool, terraces, extensive façade, and expensive equipment approaching replacement.
Translate reserves into the work they may need to fund. Ask about façade inspections and repairs, roof and waterproofing, elevators, boilers, cooling systems, plumbing stacks, windows, garage work, life-safety systems, energy requirements, and amenities. Then ask how the board expects to pay: existing cash, continued monthly contributions, an assessment, borrowing, or some combination.
A useful reserve discussion includes
- the age and expected life of major systems;
- projects completed recently and warranties still in effect;
- work planned over roughly the next three to five years;
- the quality and date of any reserve study or engineering report;
- the building’s history of funding projects through assessments;
- credit facilities, interest terms, and repayment plan; and
- whether reserves are being replenished after current work.
Assessments, arrears, and debt
An assessment is a funding decision, not a diagnosis. It may reflect proactive governance: the board identified a project, bid the work, and created a plan. It may also reveal that recurring charges and reserves were insufficient for predictable needs. The difference lies in the reason, size, duration, remaining project risk, and likelihood of another assessment.
For an active assessment, identify what it funds, when payments began and end, whether the seller will pay any balance, whether the unit can prepay, whether the project is contracted or complete, and whether cost overruns remain possible. Contract treatment belongs with the attorneys; marketability and price implications belong in the broader purchase analysis.
Arrears deserve proportion. A handful of late payments is different from persistent nonpayment across many units. Concentration matters too: one large owner or sponsor controlling many units can create operational and governance exposure even if current balances appear manageable.
Insurance and lender review can change the buyer pool
Insurance is now a central financial question, not a box to check near closing. Review major premium changes, deductibles, exclusions, open claims, loss history, coverage limits, and whether the building’s policy satisfies the proposed lender. A large deductible or an excluded condition may shift more risk to the unit owner.
Project-level lending questions can include insurance, deferred maintenance, structural conditions, critical repairs, special assessments, litigation, commercial space, owner occupancy, and investor or sponsor concentration. Standards vary by lender and loan type. A well-qualified borrower can still face a building that a particular lender will not approve.
Cash buyers should care too. Financeability influences the size of the future buyer pool. A problem that does not prevent today’s cash closing may affect tomorrow’s resale price, timing, or available purchasers.
Three patterns—and what they may mean
This may be efficient if the property is simple and major systems are young. It may also mean future work will arrive as assessments. Compare the capital plan with the funding habit.
The building may carry extensive service, amenities, ground rent, or unusually high fixed costs. Determine whether the ownership experience justifies the cost and how it affects resale demand.
The board may be preserving liquidity while funding a major project separately. Ask what each pool is for, whether the project is fully scoped, and what remains after completion.
Recurring expenses may have outrun income. Look for the board’s corrective plan: a charge increase, expense change, insurance strategy, refinancing, or another source of revenue.
These are prompts for investigation, not automatic red flags. The goal is to replace vague comfort or alarm with a reasoned view of the building’s obligations and choices.
Questions worth putting to the team
- What explains the largest year-over-year expense changes?
- Has the building operated at a recurring surplus or deficit?
- How much cash is unrestricted after known commitments?
- What capital work is planned, and how will it be funded?
- What have assessments funded in the past five years?
- Are common-charge arrears growing or concentrated?
- Has insurance coverage, cost, or deductible changed materially?
- Are there open claims, litigation, critical repairs, or lender concerns?
- How dependent is the budget on commercial income or fees?
- How many units remain sponsor-owned or investor-owned?
- Would the likely ownership cost still be competitive after a plausible increase?
- Could any issue narrow the future financed buyer pool?
Who should answer what?
A seven-pass financial review
The documents become easier to use when reviewed in a consistent order. This is not a substitute for the attorney’s diligence or the lender’s project review; it is a way to keep the commercial decision from becoming a pile of disconnected PDFs.
- Establish the property profile. Note the number of units, building age, construction type, elevators, staff, amenities, commercial space, tax structure, and major systems. Those facts define the cost base.
- Read the auditor’s opinion and notes first. Qualifications, related-party transactions, contingencies, commitments, subsequent events, and accounting changes can matter more than the cover-page surplus.
- Normalize operating results. Separate recurring revenue and expense from insurance proceeds, assessment income, tax refunds, legal settlements, and unusually large one-time repairs.
- Reconcile cash with obligations. Distinguish unrestricted operating cash, reserves, assessment funds, and money already committed to contracts or debt.
- Map the physical plan. Put every known façade, roof, elevator, mechanical, plumbing, window, energy, and amenity project beside its likely timing and funding source.
- Read the present tense. Compare the last audited year with the current budget, year-to-date performance, new insurance terms, current arrears, open projects, and the latest minutes.
- Translate findings into the purchase. Estimate a credible monthly cost, decide what deserves a price adjustment or contract question, confirm financeability, and consider how another buyer will read the same file at resale.
Stress-test ownership instead of predicting it
No buyer can forecast every assessment or expense increase. A more useful exercise is to model a few plausible conditions and decide whether the purchase still works. Start with common charges, taxes, mortgage payment, insurance, and any current assessment. Then test changes rather than pretending today’s statement is permanent.
What happens to monthly ownership if common charges rise to cover the current expense run rate or a larger reserve contribution?
Could the buyer absorb a temporary assessment while also carrying the mortgage and ordinary ownership costs?
How would a higher building premium, deductible, or unit-owner coverage requirement affect the budget?
If a lender questioned the project or an assessment were active, would the expected holding period provide enough flexibility?
The purpose is not to manufacture a frightening worst case. It is to find the point at which the economics no longer fit, then judge whether the building’s actual evidence makes that condition remote, plausible, or already visible.
How the review can change an offer
Not every concern should produce the same response. A fully funded, contracted project may simply need correct disclosure and allocation at closing. An uncertain project with no cost estimate may justify a larger margin of safety. A lender objection may require a different financing path—or make the purchase impractical. The response can be a price change, seller credit, assessment allocation, financing contingency, document condition, delayed timing, or a decision to walk away.
Market context matters. If comparable apartments in stronger buildings trade at a similar all-in monthly cost, the subject may need a discount. If the building is well capitalized after completing major work, that may support value even when its common charges are not the lowest in the neighborhood.
Frequently asked questions
How many years of condo financial statements should a buyer review?
Two or three audited years are commonly useful because they show direction rather than one result. Pair them with the current budget and recent information; the latest audit may describe a period that ended many months earlier.
Is an operating deficit always a reason not to buy?
No. Determine why it occurred, whether it is recurring, how it was funded, and what the board changed. A planned one-time expense is different from a structural gap between recurring income and recurring operations.
How much reserve per unit is enough?
No single per-unit figure works across NYC buildings. Adequacy depends on the property’s systems, age, scale, capital plan, insurance, debt, available credit, recent work, and ability to fund future projects.
Who pays an assessment after a condo goes into contract?
The answer depends on the assessment terms, payment schedule, contract, and negotiated allocation. The attorneys should document whether the seller pays, the buyer assumes installments, or another credit or adjustment applies.
Can a cash buyer ignore lender requirements?
No. The current buyer may not need project approval, but a later purchaser might. A condition that materially narrows financing can reduce resale liquidity and deserves analysis before a cash closing.
Are board minutes enough to understand upcoming work?
Minutes are valuable but incomplete. They may summarize rather than attach engineering reports, bids, claims, or legal advice. Use them to generate questions and ask the attorney or appropriate specialist to obtain the underlying current information.
This guide is educational and is not legal, tax, accounting, lending, engineering, or inspection advice. Documents, standards, and property conditions change; obtain current materials and advice for the specific purchase.
New York Attorney General: Before You Buy a Co-op or Condo
Fannie Mae: Project standards and property-insurance requirements
Compare before you choose
Ask three agents how they would read the building.
Meet buyer representatives selected for your search and compare their approach to financial diligence, valuation, and negotiation.
Request private introductions